Full Disclosure mailing list archives

RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windows


From: "Carey, Steve T GARRISON" <steven-carey () us army mil>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 15:14:29 -0500

We have seen a number of infections of Nachi/Welchia on patched systems.  Was
told that the MS03-026 patch was only 60% effective, so you still had a 1 in 3
chance of being infected.  Apparently the MS03-039 patch fixes the entire
vulnerability and not just some of it.  We re-enforced the rule for keeping the
anti-virus current, which stopped Nachi/Welchia worm (in most cases, not all).

Steve Carey

-----Original Message-----
From: Derek Vadala [mailto:derek () cynicism com]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 2:44 PM
To: pauls () utdallas edu
Cc: full-disclosure () lists netsys com; incidents () securityfocus com
Subject: RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windows


I'm thinking that there *has* to be a variant of Nachi/Welchia in the
wild.  We have machines that were patched for MS03-026 (verified by
scanning with multiple scanners) but not patched for MS03-039 (ditto)
and they have been infected by something that triggers my Nachi rule in
snort.  This should *not* be possible with the "original" Nachi/Welchia,
so my assumption is that either something new has been released or the
worm has mutated somehow.

Mind you, this is anecdotal and a very small incidence (only three
machines so far), but it still bears watching IMHO.  I've been surprised
to not see any discussion on the lists about a new variant.  Perhaps no
one is looking?

Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu)

We've seen the same thing over here. I've had a handful of machines
(perhaps 15-20 out of 2500) here that were reported to be patched against
MS03-026 yet became infected with Welchia. These machines were not patched
against MS03-039. One possibility is that the systems were already
infected with Welchia at the time they were patched against MS03-026.

I know of at least one or two cases here where the technical support
person assigned to fix a particular system didn't appropriately follow the
removal procedures and left a patched, but infected, system. I have to
assume this is happening without notice in other cases, since there
haven't been reports of a variant, and the number of systems in this
situation is rather low.

So I'm betting user error, though I find it hard to believe there isn't
another variant making the rounds.





---------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: