Re: [Snort-users] Re: Snort and SourceFire "Backdoored"

[Peteris Krumins <newsgroups () lf lv>]

Sunday, September 21, 2003, 6:24:54 PM, you wrote:

B> On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:22:03AM -0700, joeypork () hushmail com wrote:
> > I guess now that we have this incident validated as positively true from
> > the main Snort/SourceFire IT person, it lends a lot of credibility to
> > the Snort/SourceFire "backdoor" rumor. 

B> No, it does not.  Did you read my email?

B> I said this was OLD news.  A LONG time ago.  We published our findings on
B> snort.org a LONG time ago.  Your assumptions are all wrong.

B> Grow up already.  

#phrack@efnet
<xxx> I think stating that you've been owned for years makes one look even more
      incompetent. Because let's face it..if they weren't able to catch atleast
      a dozen remotely exploitable bugs in snort in their regular audits, who's
      to say they'd catch any so-called "backdooring"


It must have really been long time ago:
-rw-r--r-- 1 bmc bmc 199418 --- -- ---- snort-1.8.5-openbsd-3.0.pkg.tgz
-r--r--r-- 1 cmg cmg 1794602 --- -- ---- snort-20020129-1stable.src.rpm


P.Krumins

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html