Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Signed e-mail vs. turning off HTML mail under XP
From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu () tenebras com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 17:48:19 -0700
yossarian wrote:
The problem is that by turning off HTML for e-mail as a security measure, you disable the correct use of digitally signed e-mail, which by design is a security measure.
Not the case, AFAIK -- S/MIME doesn't depend on how you view the document. At least w/Mozilla (currently in use here) S/MIME signatures are verified even though the HTML is not rendered. -- "Well," Brahma said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is no wiser, but an intelligent man requires only two thousand five hundred." - The Mahabharata _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Signed e-mail vs. turning off HTML mail under XP yossarian (Oct 10)
- Re: Signed e-mail vs. turning off HTML mail under XP Cael Abal (Oct 10)
- Re: Signed e-mail vs. turning off HTML mail under XP yossarian (Oct 10)
- Re: Signed e-mail vs. turning off HTML mail under XP Michael Sierchio (Oct 10)
- Re: Signed e-mail vs. turning off HTML mail under XP yossarian (Oct 11)
- Re: Signed e-mail vs. turning off HTML mail under XP yossarian (Oct 10)
- Re: Signed e-mail vs. turning off HTML mail under XP Cael Abal (Oct 10)