Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: SV: MS RPC remote exploit.
From: Holger van Lengerich (Telefónica Deutschland) <hvl () telefonica de>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:43:29 +0200 (CEST)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Peter Kruse wrote:
Systems already updated are not vulnerable to this exploit.
Just to get this straight: Systems updated according to MS03-39 are not vulnerable. Systems on which only MS03-26 is applied are still vulnerable. BTW: Do you know that the exploit works by conducting a test yourself or by "hearsay"? Regards, Holger -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/hYImR9A/7YTqjgURAtvfAJ9ipS0RiEvlRHVZlOqJyJGcF0zI4QCeIkES GCSYk2kSP5U+bFdZLGk7388= =NVGr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: MS RPC remote exploit., (continued)
- Re: MS RPC remote exploit. Patrick Brauch (Oct 09)
- Re: [normal] Re: MS RPC remote exploit. What about DCOMbobulator? opticfiber (Oct 09)
- Re: [normal] Re: MS RPC remote exploit. What about DCOMbobulator? Russell Fulton (Oct 09)
- Re: [normal] Re: MS RPC remote exploit. What about DCOMbobulator? Vladimir Parkhaev (Oct 09)
- Re: [normal] Re: MS RPC remote exploit. What about DCOMbobulator? Patrick Brauch (Oct 09)
- Re: [normal] Re: MS RPC remote exploit. What about DCOMbobulator? opticfiber (Oct 09)
- Re: MS RPC remote exploit. Kilian CAVALOTTI (Oct 09)
- RE: MS RPC remote exploit. Nathan (Oct 09)
- Re: MS RPC remote exploit. Stephen (Oct 09)
- RE: [inbox] Re: MS RPC remote exploit. Curt Purdy (Oct 09)
- SV: MS RPC remote exploit. Peter Kruse (Oct 09)
- Re: SV: MS RPC remote exploit. Telefónica Deutschland (Oct 09)
- RE: MS RPC remote exploit. Trey Mujakporue/UK/Tesco (Oct 10)
- Re: MS RPC remote exploit. Patrick Brauch (Oct 09)