Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: NINCOMPOOPERY OF MICROSOFT
From: Georgi Guninski <guninski () guninski com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 22:06:46 +0300
This user Bullmur should be carefull with the word "criminal". Question to the lawyers on the list: It is my understanding that "criminal" is someone who breaks the law. microsoft seem to have been found guilty by a court in the antitrust trial, so they seem to have broken the law. Are microsoft criminals from legal point of view? Or does justice work this way: if you deface a website, you are a criminal, but if you screw most of the internet you are a hero? georgi On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 07:54:12 -0700 <dhtml () hush com> wrote:
"Hackers are criminals" Most, he notes, release their malicious code after patches for Microsoft software have been released, meaning that they are simply reverse engineering to exploit security weaknesses or holes in software. - Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer 'ninkum`poop [n] a stupid foolish person See Also: simple, simpleton
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- NINCOMPOOPERY OF MICROSOFT dhtml (Oct 01)
- Re: NINCOMPOOPERY OF MICROSOFT Georgi Guninski (Oct 01)
- Re: NINCOMPOOPERY OF MICROSOFT Joel R. Helgeson (Oct 01)
- Re: NINCOMPOOPERY OF MICROSOFT Gregory A. Gilliss (Oct 01)
- Re: NINCOMPOOPERY OF MICROSOFT madsaxon (Oct 01)
- RE: NINCOMPOOPERY OF MICROSOFT Brent Colflesh (Oct 01)
- Re: NINCOMPOOPERY OF MICROSOFT Stormwalker (Oct 01)
- Re: NINCOMPOOPERY OF MICROSOFT Georgi Guninski (Oct 02)
- Re: NINCOMPOOPERY OF MICROSOFT Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 02)
- Re: NINCOMPOOPERY OF MICROSOFT Georgi Guninski (Oct 01)