Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Linux (in)security (Was: Re: Re: No Subject)
From: Darren Reed <avalon () caligula anu edu au>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 08:55:07 +1000 (Australia/ACT)
In some mail from Bassett, Mark, sie said:
I think something we are also forgetting is that statistically *nix users are people who are computer geeks. Average joe #1 buys his pc from Best buy pre-loaded with windows XP and has no clue how to install it. Currently vendor pre-loaded *nix machines aren't very popular, which means in order to have linux on your machine, you must download/purchase it and load it yourself. Most people don't want to mess with the hassle of the whole thing, aside from the fact that it doesn't play new game #1313413. All this means is that the *typical* *nix user knows what they are doing and therefore knows to keep the machine updated.
Cripes, just you far down in the sand do some of you have your head ? If someone discovers a new hole in say IIS plus apache/sendmail, and writes a worm/DoS that takes advantage of it, properly, you won't know about it until 'every' host on the 'net is infected or it stops. Darren _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: Linux (in)security (Was: Re: Re: No Subject) Bassett, Mark (Oct 24)
- Re: Linux (in)security (Was: Re: Re: No Subject) Benjamin Krueger (Oct 24)
- Re: Linux (in)security (Was: Re: Re: No Subject) Darren Reed (Oct 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Linux (in)security (Was: Re: Re: No Subject) Bassett, Mark (Oct 27)
- Re: Linux (in)security (Was: Re: Re: No Subject) Darren Reed (Oct 27)