Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: SSH Exploit Request
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 15:19:11 -0500
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 12:08:41 EST, Robert Davies <phantasm () textbox net> said:
I am quite bothered out the ass by well paid admins that are too damn lazy to spend the few minutes it takes to repair a flawed service. Either start doing your job, or get the hell out of the way for those of us that want to do the job required properly!
Actually, the *original* problem was that the OP *wanted* to apply the patch to fix a flawed service, but was prevented from doing so by a flawed policy. Now tell me - would *you* install the patch anyhow, knowing that (possibly) doing so without all the change-control paperwork being done correctly would mean your ass would be canned and you'd be looking for another job?
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- SSH Exploit Request Jack Chum (Nov 12)
- Re: SSH Exploit Request Florian Weimer (Nov 13)
- Re: SSH Exploit Request Jeremiah Cornelius (Nov 13)
- Re: SSH Exploit Request Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 13)
- RE: SSH Exploit Request Robert Davies (Nov 13)
- Re: SSH Exploit Request Blue Boar (Nov 13)
- RE: SSH Exploit Request Poof (Nov 13)
- Re: SSH Exploit Request Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 13)
- Re: SSH Exploit Request Scott Taylor (Nov 13)
- RE: SSH Exploit Request Robert Davies (Nov 13)
- Re: SSH Exploit Request Andrew J Caines (Nov 13)
- Re: SSH Exploit Request Jeremiah Cornelius (Nov 13)
- Re: SSH Exploit Request Florian Weimer (Nov 13)
- Re: SSH Exploit Request Florian Weimer (Nov 13)
- RE: SSH Exploit Request g0d (Nov 14)
- Re: SSH Exploit Request Vladimir Parkhaev (Nov 14)
- Re: SSH Exploit Request g0d (Nov 14)
- Re: SSH Exploit Request Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 14)
- Re: SSH Exploit Request Paul Schmehl (Nov 14)
- Re: SSH Exploit Request Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 14)