Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Fw: Red Hat Linux end-of-life update and transition planning


From: Jeremiah Cornelius <jeremiah () nur net>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 13:23:26 -0800

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 04 November 2003 06:18, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Mon, 03 Nov 2003 21:51:09 MST, Michael Gale said:


Oh -- did I mention that slackware is the most Unix like distro
available.
 There is a reason that hotmail is running on FreeBSD and NOT
Red Hat


Who owns Hotmail?

Who is the biggest opponent of the GPL?

Who'd prefer not being caught dead running a GPL system, and look for ANY
alternative if their own operating system wasn't scalable to the task,
even
 if it wasn't technically the best choice?

Remember, businesses make decisions for lots of reasons other than sheer
technical merit. Often, political/perception issues count for more....

The FreeBSD decision was made in the years BEFORE MS bought them.  It's a 
legacy MS has tried - with mixed success - to replace with W2K/ASP.

I beleieve the original Hotmail engineers were inspired by the use of BSD at 
Yahoo!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/qBjOJi2cv3XsiSARAnf6AKDRX9Xk/zcaPo4tZaRkP2lwxnJVFwCg5oI5
MyIF7X82/Qx9rVd9caA9C8o=
=1BGs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: