Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security
From: |reduced|minus|none| <p00p () instable net>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 18:16:37 -0500
Exibar wrote:
What an idiot.... Take the loveletter worm, when it was first released even if you had a 100% up to date AntiVirus software program, you would still get hit within the first 8 hours.... slammer, blaster, etc all the same thing. The took advantage of holes in the OPERATING SYSTEM!!!!
loveletter didn't. you had to open it. -- p00p () instable net AIM: l4m3n00b MSN: l4m3n00b () hotmail com http://www.instable.net GnuPG Public Key: http://www.instable.net/pubkey.asc"The only sovereign you can allow to rule you is reason." - Wizard's Sixth Rule, "Faith of the Fallen" by Terry Goodkind
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security |reduced|minus|none| (Oct 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Beaty, Bryan (Oct 31)
- RE: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security james (Oct 31)
- RE: [spam] RE: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Exibar (Nov 01)
- udp port 2615 Trond Kringstad (Nov 01)
- RE: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Cedric Blancher (Nov 01)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security William Warren (Nov 02)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Matthew Murphy (Nov 02)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Geoincidents (Nov 02)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Matthew Murphy (Nov 02)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Geoincidents (Nov 02)