Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security
From: "Geoincidents" <geoincidents () getinfo org>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 06:03:40 -0500
But IMHO, that *is* the point. If it's on the Internet, it's exposed . . . And if a stored procedure is exposed, then the whole system is exposed . . .
Nonsense, you read to many MS papers <g>. Lots of ISP's run SQL servers on the internet for radius authentication, where the database and stored procedures are not exposed. Just because MS describes something you don't consider safe, you are assuming there isn't a safe way to do it? If what you say is true, then all the MS databases where they store registration information, windows update information, activation information, they must all be exposed so how about posting exploits for them so we can get MS to secure our data? Or are those on the net yet not exposed? Geo. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- udp port 2615, (continued)
- udp port 2615 Trond Kringstad (Nov 01)
- RE: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Cedric Blancher (Nov 01)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security William Warren (Nov 02)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Matthew Murphy (Nov 02)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Geoincidents (Nov 02)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Matthew Murphy (Nov 02)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Geoincidents (Nov 02)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security George Capehart (Nov 03)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Geoincidents (Nov 03)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security George Capehart (Nov 03)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Geoincidents (Nov 04)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 04)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Dave Howe (Nov 04)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security George Capehart (Nov 04)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Nick FitzGerald (Nov 02)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 02)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Frank Knobbe (Nov 02)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' forgood security Lan Guy (Nov 03)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Nick FitzGerald (Nov 02)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Darren Reed (Nov 02)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Cedric Blancher (Nov 02)