Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: IDS (ISS) and reverse engineering
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 23:44:31 -0500
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 20:15:42 +1100, "V.O." said:
What struck me - isn't this kind of activity actually illegal in the US?
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/1201.html 17 USC 1201 (j) has an exemption for security testing, although it's possible to read 17 USC 1201(j)(3)(B) as meaning you can't post it to a public list... Of course, that only applies to taking a whack at copy-protection schemes - you also have to stay on the right side of 18 USC 1030: http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1030.html
which extent it is possible to disassemble Windows code? And if it is
Didn't Allchin say under oath that there was code in Windows so ugly that if you read it out loud, you needed to roll a D20 and see which Elder God showed up to suck your intestines out through your ear? http://www.hplovecraft.com/creation/bestiary.htm I'd worry about that more than the legality of it. :)
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- IDS (ISS) and reverse engineering V.O. (Nov 26)
- Nokia IPSO Frederic Charpentier (Nov 26)
- Re: Nokia IPSO Sandro Littke (Nov 26)
- Re: Nokia IPSO William Brady (Nov 26)
- Re: Nokia IPSO Keith W. McCammon (Nov 26)
- Re: Nokia IPSO Sandro Littke (Nov 26)
- RE: Nokia IPSO jussi jaakonaho (Nov 26)
- Re: Nokia IPSO Gareth Bromley (Nov 26)
- Re: Nokia IPSO Sandro Littke (Nov 26)
- Re: Nokia IPSO Stephen Perciballi (Nov 26)
- Nokia IPSO Frederic Charpentier (Nov 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: IDS (ISS) and reverse engineering Christopher F. Herot (Nov 27)