Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: SRT2003-05-08-1137 - ListProc mailing list ULISTPROC_UMASK overflow
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 08:14:41 -0400
On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 12:15:41PM -0500, KF said:
not on hand to thoroughly test the fix. SecNetOps did not have the facilities to compile the new version of catmail in efforts to test the fix on our own. The problem appeared to be caused by a series of strcat()
Huh? They can't come up with a Linux box with enough HD space to store the source code? What, does the company use PCs in their school library to do all their Important Security Consultant Work? Never mind, I just looked at their website. Maybe they truly DON'T have any Linux or other UNIX boxes. -- Shawn McMahon | Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, EIV Consulting | that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any UNIX and Linux | hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure http://www.eiv.com| the survival and the success of liberty. - JFK
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- SRT2003-05-08-1137 - ListProc mailing list ULISTPROC_UMASK overflow KF (May 08)
- Re: SRT2003-05-08-1137 - ListProc mailing list ULISTPROC_UMASK overflow Shawn McMahon (May 09)
- Re: SRT2003-05-08-1137 - ListProc mailing list ULISTPROC_UMASK overflow KF (May 09)
- Re: SRT2003-05-08-1137 - ListProc mailing list ULISTPROC_UMASK overflow Shawn McMahon (May 09)
- Re: SRT2003-05-08-1137 - ListProc mailing list ULISTPROC_UMASK overflow Larry W. Cashdollar (May 09)
- Re: SRT2003-05-08-1137 - ListProc mailing list ULISTPROC_UMASK overflow KF (May 09)
- Re: SRT2003-05-08-1137 - ListProc mailing list ULISTPROC_UMASK overflow Shawn McMahon (May 09)