Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: RE: [Symantec Security Advisor] Symantec Security Check ActiveX Buffer Overflow


From: Cesar <cesarc56 () yahoo com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:06:35 -0700 (PDT)

Anyone want to exploit the bug? 
Symantec is very happy to help attackers:

http://enterprisesecurity.symantec.com/SecurityServices/content.cfm?ArticleID=682&EID=";><script>alert()</script>

Cesar.

--- Jason Coombs <jasonc () science org> wrote:
Aloha, Symantec Security.

Two questions:

1) Does this ActiveX control bear a digital
signature? If so, the problem it
causes does not go away simply because there is a
new version available from
Symantec. An attacker in possession of the bad code
with its attached digital
signature can fool a victim whose computer does not
currently have the
vulnerable code installed into trusting the ActiveX
control due to the fact
that Symantec's digital signature will validate
against the trusted root CA
certificate present by default in Windows -- the
existence of the digital
.....

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: