Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette
From: "Roy S. Rapoport" <full-disclosure () ols inorganic org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:39:40 -0700
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 02:05:07PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
I'm fully in favour of "quoted-line to new content" ratio moderation.
[...]
You do, of course, realize that sometimes a one-line "read THIS url" suffices?
[filler deleted] Well, there's also such a thing as "editing the quoted text." You don't have to quote someone's entire email to say "read this URL." As an example, notice how, despite the fact you quoted about seven lines and then added about seven lines, I'm managing to have more original contribution without resorting to filler simply by editing down your contribution to the necessary and useful gist. -roy _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette Len Rose (Jun 26)
- Re: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette Nick FitzGerald (Jun 26)
- RE: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette Curt Purdy (Jun 27)
- Re: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 27)
- Re: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette Roy S. Rapoport (Jun 27)
- Re: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette Troy (Jun 27)
- Re: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 27)
- Re: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette Shawn McMahon (Jun 27)
- Re: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette Nick FitzGerald (Jun 27)
- Re: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette Nick FitzGerald (Jun 26)
- Re: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette Frank Tobin (Jun 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Adminstrivia: Digest Limits/Netiquette Schmehl, Paul L (Jun 27)