Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Indigostar - Perledit


From: "morning_wood" <se_cur_ity () hotmail com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 14:28:50 -0700

right, i did not know exactly how to classify it, mabey there is a
buffer for the connection
and its not flushing on disconnect??  it does bind to 0.0.0.0:1956
I assume looking at the file it is for traceback function in the
registered version.
Nevertheless a interesting scenario for a DoS, type of thing targeted
at a user
is quite interesting.

morning_wood


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "petard" <petard () sdf lonestar org>
To: "morning_wood" <se_cur_ity () hotmail com>
Cc: <full-disclosure () lists netsys com>
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Indigostar - Perledit


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 03:12:31AM -0700, morning_wood wrote:
Vunerability:
-------------
Remote Overflow

What evidence did you see that this is an overflow? While I wouldn't
discount
the possibility of an overflow being present somewhere here, the
crash alone
doesn't necessarily imply an overflow. In fact, I'd say that this
most likely
isn't unless there is some specific evidence to the contrary.

At any rate, this does certainly open the possibility of an
irritating denial
of service attack against perledit users. It should almost certainly
only
listen on 127.0.0.0.1:1956 instead of 0.0.0.0:1956. Does anyone know
why this
editor accepts remote connections in the first place?

Regards,
petard

- -- 
"There are 10 kinds of people in this world: those who understand
binary,
and those who don't." --unknown
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE+9htjgkiZ59A0kiQRAu+XAJ908VfLIqeRYFRwKh9H0+APQJcD/QCbBnD7
hg2vhT8CQ/wLpC8kntV1WKI=
=FUYA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: