Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Apache 1.3.27 Remote Root 0-Day
From: Michael <mike-full () megaglobal net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2003 11:15:37 -0400
Maybe now we can STFU and concentrate on actual disclosure? I'm curious as to why there has been no discussion about this apache report. The poster of this message didnt include any info on the details of the problem nor an exploit, which leaves us wondering. (The insult was cute though) This could be some serious isht if indeed it is true. Can anyone confirm/dispute? -M -- . Michael Jastremski ............................................................. .. Network Engineer > Megaglobal Networks > Megaglobal.net ....................... ...... Photographer > Open Photo Project > Openphoto.net ........................ .......... Resident > West Philadelphia > Westphila.net ........................ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Apache 1.3.27 Remote Root 0-Day koec (Jun 19)
- Re: Apache 1.3.27 Remote Root 0-Day Michael (Jun 20)
- Re: Apache 1.3.27 Remote Root 0-Day KF (Jun 20)
- Re: Apache 1.3.27 Remote Root 0-Day Joe Stewart (Jun 20)
- Re: Apache 1.3.27 Remote Root 0-Day James Greenhalgh (Jun 20)
- Re: Apache 1.3.27 Remote Root 0-Day William D. Colburn (aka Schlake) (Jun 20)
- Re: Apache 1.3.27 Remote Root 0-Day nikoteen (Jun 20)
- Re: Apache 1.3.27 Remote Root 0-Day Matt (Jun 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Apache 1.3.27 Remote Root 0-Day Andreas Gietl (Jun 20)
- Re: Apache 1.3.27 Remote Root 0-Day xbud (Jun 20)
- Re: Apache 1.3.27 Remote Root 0-Day Michael (Jun 20)