RE: Re: Administrivia: Poll

["Steve Wray" <steve.wray () paradise net nz>]

Maybe the moderated list should be called
Full Un-Disclosure or FUD.
Oh... wait

> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com 
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf Of Steve
> Sent: Thursday, 19 June 2003 2:01 a.m.
> To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
> Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: Administrivia: Poll
>
>
> On Friday 13 June 2003 12:54 pm, Andreas Gietl wrote:
> > On Friday 13 June 2003 17:47, dev-null () no-id com wrote:
> >
> > sounds good to me. This way we could keep all the questions out and
> > just let "full disclosure" in.
> >
> > But i wonder if this may raise to legal problems for the moderators.
> > Maybe sometimes a vendor comes to the solution the disclosure of a
> > security vuln lead to damage. He may not get the "poster", but he
> > will get the moderators. Since the moderators MUST read all posts,
> > they will be responsible for the information that goes on 
> to the list
> > and have to judge if the content is legal or not. So this would be
> > kinnda hot ....
>
> Legal?!?
>
> Since when does the accurecy or availability of listings on 
> FD (or any 
> other list) constitute anything more than "For Your Info, but you 
> decide for yourself" postings?
>
> -- 
>  
> Steve Szmidt
> V.P. Information Technology
> Video Group Distributors, Inc.
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html