Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: atrticle in: Security Wire Perspectives, Vol. 5, NO. 93, December 19, 2003
From: George Capehart <capegeo () opengroup org>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 18:26:19 -0500
On Friday 19 December 2003 12:20 pm, Ron DuFresne wrote: <snip>
missed this. The reason I ask is, there has been a large shift in the security "lists/field/top dogs" in trying to avoid casting blame/responsibility at M$ for the products it has pushed into the market place, perhaps due to the deep pockets and breadth of market saturation, thus dependance of many upon the M$ pocketbook to feed the rest of the industry in one fashion or another. The critical articles of a year+ past seem to now, especially after the @stake recent actions, to be focused these days upon avoiding mentioning the shortcomings from redmond. Are others reading the same these days?
Yep. -- George Capehart capegeo at opengroup dot org PGP Key ID: 0x63F0F642 available on most public key servers "It is always possible to agglutenate multiple separate problems into a single complex interdependent solution. In most cases this is a bad idea." -- RFC 1925 _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- atrticle in: Security Wire Perspectives, Vol. 5, NO. 93, December 19, 2003 Ron DuFresne (Dec 19)
- Re: atrticle in: Security Wire Perspectives, Vol. 5, NO. 93, December 19, 2003 George Capehart (Dec 19)
- Re: atrticle in: Security Wire Perspectives, Vol. 5, NO. 93, December 19, 2003 Bruce Ediger (Dec 21)