Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: The *real* reason the pivx unpatched IE fla ws page was taken offline?
From: "Tonneson, Thomas" <thomas.tonneson () fortis co im>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 14:23:25 -0000
From Dec 2002
http://web.archive.org/web/20021205094932/http://www.pivx.com/larholm/unpatc hed/ <http://web.archive.org/web/20021205094932/http://www.pivx.com/larholm/unpat ched/> There was another Feb 03 but it seems unavailable. Cheers Tom Tonneson -----Original Message----- From: Jelmer [mailto:jkuperus () planet nl] Sent: 11 December 2003 12:41 To: full-disclosure () netsys com Subject: [Full-disclosure] The *real* reason the pivx unpatched IE flaws page was taken offline? On 12 october PIVX removed the IE unpatched IE flaws page "for the good of the internet as a whole" http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/10/12/2221205 <http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/10/12/2221205&mode=thread&tid=109&tid =126&tid=128&tid=172&tid=187> &mode=thread&tid=109&tid=126&tid=128&tid=172&tid=187 Now looking thru the pivx client list http://www.pivx.com/clients.html <http://www.pivx.com/clients.html> the *real* reason becomes blantantly obvious.
Current thread:
- RE: The *real* reason the pivx unpatched IE fla ws page was taken offline? Tonneson, Thomas (Dec 11)
- RE: The *real* reason the pivx unpatched IE flaws page was taken offline? List Account (Dec 11)