Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: Microsoft MCWNDX.OCX ActiveX buffer overflow
From: Georgi Guninski <guninski () guninski com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 23:10:40 +0300
So you are collecting 0days for free, put them in a lame database and whine more than a script kiddie this is a hard job?
Steven M. Christey wrote:
By the way, this is one of the many things that makes vulnerability databases expensive to maintain (assuming that correctness is a desirable feature of such databases).
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Microsoft urging users to buy Harware Firewalls, (continued)
- Re: Microsoft urging users to buy Harware Firewalls William Warren (Aug 22)
- Re: Microsoft urging users to buy Harware Firewalls Sven Hoexter (Aug 22)
- RE: Microsoft urging users to buy Harware Firewalls Rick Kingslan (Aug 13)
- Re: +++++SPAM+++++ RE: Microsoft urging users to buy Harware Firewalls Michael Scheidell (Aug 14)
- RE: +++++SPAM+++++ RE: Microsoft urging users to buyHarware Firewalls Simon (Aug 14)
- Re: Microsoft urging users to buy Harware Firewalls Nathan Seven (Aug 13)
- Re: Microsoft urging users to buy Harware Firewalls Sebastian Niehaus (Aug 14)
- Re: Microsoft urging users to buy Harware Firewalls Joey (Aug 14)
- Re: Re: Microsoft MCWNDX.OCX ActiveX buffer overflow Georgi Guninski (Aug 15)
- Re: Microsoft MCWNDX.OCX ActiveX buffer overflow Matthew Murphy (Aug 15)
- RE: Microsoft MCWNDX.OCX ActiveX buffer overflow Drew Copley (Aug 15)