Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: The MSBlast Conspiracy Theory
From: "Mike Vasquez" <mike () blakogre com>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 10:18:31 -0700
Ya, but I think it's just as likely someone who had very little coding knowledge, but wanted to be the first to get a worm out. If they subscribe to the list, they're probably laughing at the conspiracy theories being put forth. Mike, AEIOU, and sometimes Y ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeremiah Cornelius" <jeremiah () nur net> To: <full-disclosure () lists netsys com> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 8:54 AM Subject: [fd] Re: [Full-disclosure] The MSBlast Conspiracy Theory
On Thursday 14 August 2003 09:55 pm, Weezer Hutchins wrote:This was such a benign implementation of the serious DCOM security risk, that my conspiracy theory is ... Microsoft had this worm released on purpose in an attempt to get everyone to patch their machines before a really threatening version was released.Well, MSBlast was kludged together poorly enough. That in itself is another indicator supporting your theory. -- Jeremiah Cornelius, CISSP, CCNA, MCSE Information Security Technology email: jcorneli () hotmail com - mobile: 415.235.7689
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- The MSBlast Conspiracy Theory Weezer Hutchins (Aug 14)
- Re: The MSBlast Conspiracy Theory Brad Pryce (Aug 15)
- Re: The MSBlast Conspiracy Theory Joey (Aug 15)
- Re: The MSBlast Conspiracy Theory Jeremiah Cornelius (Aug 15)
- Re: The MSBlast Conspiracy Theory Mike Vasquez (Aug 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: The MSBlast Conspiracy Theory Noble, Jim (Aug 15)
- RE: The MSBlast Conspiracy Theory Dark-Avenger (Aug 15)