Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: aside: worm vs. worm?
From: Darren Bennett <DARREN.L.BENNETT () saic com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 11:07:15 -0700
I disagree.. MS would have been hit harder than other OS's regardless of the number of paying customers. The argument that Microsoft is the most popular and therefore the most hacked is inaccurate. Apache is on more than 2/3 of all web servers and IIS is STILL the most hacked. Sendmail is on the majority of all (internet facing) email servers and Exchange is the most hacked. Do I think Microsoft tries to screw up? NO.. they just seem to have a gift. It is very hard to retrofit a ship to be a submarine, and the same is true when you try and make a non-networked application (windows) a networked OS. Unix/Linux/etc.. were designed to be networked and secure, that gives them the edge (and always will). -DB On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 07:44, Andrew Thomas wrote:
From: Mike Sent: 12 August 2003 12:11 Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] aside: worm vs. worm? lol yeah and I guess we would all need to move to a better platform or a different job :) -----Original Message----- From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com [mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf Of Joey Sent: Tuesday, 12 August 2003 9:36 p.m. To: Darren Reed; Andrew J Homan Cc: full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] aside: worm vs. worm? imagine if the bug wiped out the infected computers' harddrives. microsoft would be put out of business.Not that I disagree with the assessment of there perhaps being a 'better platform' for a lot of operations, but by the same token would linux or freebsd no longer be used if someone had written or writes a malicious worm for these platforms? I doubt it. M$ may only be more vulnerable to this because of the fact that they have paying customers. Sure, it'll hit them where it hurts (financially) and they'd suffer more than an OS operating system, but that wouldn't be any more a rational response than we generally see from people when they're scared. -- Andrew G. Thomas Hobbs & Associates Chartered Accountants (SA) (o) +27-(0)21-683-0500 (f) +27-(0)21-683-0577 (m) +27-(0)83-318-4070 _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
-- ----------------------------------------------- Darren Bennett CISSP, Certified Unix Admin., MCSE, MCSA, MCP +I Sr. Systems Administrator/Manager Science Applications International Corporation Advanced Systems Development and Integration ----------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- aside: worm vs. worm? Andrew J Homan (Aug 11)
- RE: aside: worm vs. worm? Arian J. Evans (Aug 11)
- Re: aside: worm vs. worm? Nick FitzGerald (Aug 11)
- RE: aside: worm vs. worm? gml (Aug 11)
- RE: aside: worm vs. worm? gml (Aug 12)
- Re: aside: worm vs. worm? Darren Reed (Aug 12)
- Re: aside: worm vs. worm? akbara (Aug 12)
- Re: aside: worm vs. worm? Joey (Aug 12)
- RE: aside: worm vs. worm? Mike (Aug 12)
- RE: aside: worm vs. worm? Andrew Thomas (Aug 12)
- RE: aside: worm vs. worm? Darren Bennett (Aug 12)
- RE: aside: worm vs. worm? Andrew Thomas (Aug 13)
- Re: aside: worm vs. worm? Stephen Clowater (Aug 12)
- RE: aside: worm vs. worm? Mike Fratto (Aug 12)
- Re: aside: worm vs. worm? Stephen Clowater (Aug 12)
- RE: aside: worm vs. worm? Geo. (Aug 12)
- RE: aside: worm vs. worm? Aditya (Aug 13)
- Re[2]: aside: worm vs. worm? Geysap (Aug 13)
- Re: aside: worm vs. worm? Darren Reed (Aug 12)