Re: MSblast worm

[tom () doctorunix com]

The version we have here does not spread to W2000 boxes until they get SP3
installed.  Then they are immediately compromised.  NT4 did not infect.

tc

Quoting Mike.Keighley () lexicon co uk:

> Ah, yes.  The vulnerability does indeed exist in NT.
> But with respect, what Jasper asks is whether the *MSblast worm* affects
> NT ?
> The exploit code and discussions on here seem to suggest it targets only
> 2000 and XP.
>
> Does *this exploit* target NT successfully ?  Not that I have seen /
> heard.
> Could an exploit be written which exploits NT ?  Oh yes.
>
> --
> Mike
>
> Simon Glassman <simon () bsdbox co uk> wrote:
> > This is affecting the following machines.
> > Windows NT 4.0 server
> > Windows NT 4.0 Terminal Server Edition
> > Windows 2000
> > Windows XP 32 Bit Edition
> > Windows XP 64 Bit Edition
> > Windows Server 2003 32 Bit Edition
> > Windows Server 2003 64 Bit Edition
> > More info <snip> security/bulletin/MS03-026.asp
>
> > > On Tuesday 12 August 2003 11:53 am, Jasper Blackwell wrote:
> > > Does anyone know if this MSblast worm affects Win NT machines,
> > > or is it just infecting 2000 and XP.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html




-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html