Re: Cox is blocking port 135 - off topic

[martin f krafft <madduck () madduck net>]

also sprach Kurt Seifried <listuser () seifried org> [2003.08.10.2256 +0200]:
> If Cox blocks both ports 135 and 445 that will be semi-effective

... until the next worm goes haywire. It just seems so ironic that
security is reactive, thanks largely to Microsoft, when in many
cases, a proactive approach would make our lives so much easier
(albeit not prevent attacks, of course)...

No matter what Cox does (not that I care), I just don't see a single
reason anymore to deploy Windows ever again.

-- 
martin;              (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
  \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck
 
invalid/expired pgp subkeys? use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
 
i am willing to make the mistakes
if someone else is willing to learn from them.

Attachment: _bin
Description: