Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Bill Gates blames the victim
From: "Richard M. Smith" <rms () computerbytesman com>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 10:28:32 -0400
Hi, I just saw this interview with Bill Gates in today's New York Times: Virus Aside, Gates Says Reliability Is Greater http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/31/technology/31SMIC.html Boy, talking about blaming the victim: [Gates] "The fact that these attacks are coming out and that people's software is not up to date in a way that fully prevents an attack on them is something we feel very bad about." And ducking questions by blaming the victim: Q. "The buffer overrun flaw that made the Blaster worm possible was specifically targeted in your code reviews last year. Do you understand why the flaw that led to Blaster escaped your detection?" A. "Understand there have actually been fixes for all of these things before the attack took place. The challenge is that we've got to get the fixes to be automatically applied without our customers having to make a special effort." Patching security holes is a poor substitute for avoiding them in the first place. If three guys in Poland can find a buffer overflow in DCOM without access to Windows source code, why can't Microsoft? Richard M. Smith http://www.ComputerBytesMan.com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Bill Gates blames the victim Richard M. Smith (Aug 31)
- Re: Bill Gates blames the victim B.K. DeLong (Aug 31)
- Re: Bill Gates blames the victim pandora (Aug 31)
- Re: Bill Gates blames the victim Paul Schmehl (Aug 31)
- Re: Bill Gates blames the victim Florian Weimer (Aug 31)
- Re: Bill Gates blames the victim Peter Busser (Aug 31)