RE: SpamAssasin - path disclosure

["ViLLaN" <villain () protonic com>]

No one is denying that Spamassasin is in use, they are saying that the
section of the header showing the path (what your original post was
about from what I understood), is Interscan, not Spamassasin..  
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: morning_wood [mailto:se_cur_ity () hotmail com] 
Sent: Monday, 25 August 2003 10:25 AM
To: ViLLaN; full-disclosure () lists netsys com
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] SpamAssasin - path disclosure


sigh
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en
<http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=X-Spam-Checker-V
ersion%3A+SpamAssassin+&btnG=Google+Search>
&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=X-Spam-Checker-Version%3A+SpamAssassin+&btnG=Google
+Search
 
 
1. http://www.cs.arizona.edu/computer.help/policy/spam_filtering.html
2. http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-linux-e/2003-Apr/0554.html
3. http://spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_PerMsgStatus.html
4. http://lpsc.in2p3.fr/informatique/faq/spamassassin.html
5. http://www.unit.liu.se/irt/epost/spamassassin.html
 
still wrong?
 
Donnie Werner
co-cofounder - Chief Technical Officer
e2-labs Pvt Ltd
 
 
 
----- Original Message ----- 

From: ViLLaN <mailto:villain () protonic com>  
To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com 
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 4:25 PM
Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] SpamAssasin - path disclosure


Kane is correct... Interscan viruswall is responsible for that
quarantine..