Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!!
From: Damian Gerow <damian () sentex net>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 11:15:07 -0400
Thus spake Daniele Muscetta (daniele () muscetta com) [22/08/03 10:59]:
ALL LIST MEMBERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO RESPOND AND MAKE A CHOICE AS TO HOW THEY WANT THIS BASIC FUNCTION OF THE LIST TO CONTINUE OPERATING.[FD] would be fine.If it has to be short for those who use text based MUA, at least leave this short one. It should not be such a deal to pass from extra 18 chars in the subject to just 5, should it?
I used a text-based MUA. And I find that I get a few words of the subject, after I see '[Full-Disclosure]'. Personally, I /like/ subject tags, but short ones. So something like [fd] or [fud] would be fine with me. But I think that the bulk of this decision is up to Len and the other moderators. We've had one vote already, and since this seems to be a sore point for some folk, why not have another?
Regardless, it is much easier to filter based on subject line.It is indeed easier. One can of course also filter on headers, but in my situation - for example - I don't filter at a server level (where i don't have access myself) but at a client level.
As do, I'm sure, a large number of subscribers/posters here. I filter at a client level, yet I *never* filter based on subject. Too risky of hitting a false positive. It's much easier to filter based on Sender: or List-Id: or whatever ezmlm uses, and gives me a little more peace-of-mind.
And often I access my mail in IMAP from a DIFFERENT client (webmail, anyone?)... and the subject line is very useful in SWIMMING through the tons of UNFILTERED messages of this one an other lists, and getting to those OTHER messages quicker....
Exactly why subject line tags are important. I have two places where I read my mail. One is filtered, the other can *not* be filtered. So subject lines are *extremely* handy in the latter case, but I couldn't care less in the former. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!! Chris Cappuccio (Aug 21)
- RE: Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!! Drew Copley (Aug 21)
- RE: Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!! Daniele Muscetta (Aug 22)
- Re: Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!! Damian Gerow (Aug 22)
- Re: Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!! Mathieu (Aug 22)
- RE: Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!! Daniele Muscetta (Aug 22)
- RE: Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!! Drew Copley (Aug 21)
- Re: Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!! Noldata TAC (Aug 21)
- Re: Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!! Richard Spiers (Aug 21)
- Re: Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!! 8tImER (Aug 21)
- Re: Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!! John Cartwright (Aug 21)
- Re: Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!! Chris Cappuccio (Aug 21)
- All Caps means it's important, right? (was Re: {mumble} READ THIS! SURVEY!!) Etaoin Shrdlu (Aug 21)
- Re: Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!! Chris Cappuccio (Aug 21)
- Re: Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!! Bernhard Seibold (Aug 21)
- Re: Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!! Shanphen Dawa (Aug 21)
- Re: Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!! Jeff Pickell (Aug 21)