Full Disclosure mailing list archives
[Full-Disclosure] Re: Full-disclosure digest, Vol 1 #1052 - 29 msgs
From: Arthur Corliss <corliss () digitalmages com>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 12:11:31 -0800 (AKDT)
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 10:43:02 -0700 From: Chris Cappuccio <chris () nmedia net> To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: [Full-disclosure] Subject prefix changing! READ THIS! SURVEY!! Hey folks, ALL LIST MEMBERS ARE ENCOURAGED TO RESPOND AND MAKE A CHOICE AS TO HOW THEY WANT THIS BASIC FUNCTION OF THE LIST TO CONTINUE OPERATING. The subject header is going to change. This is a survey to see whether people want: 1. To have no subject prefix, that is, we remove [Full-Disclosure] or 2. To shorten the subject prefix from [Full-Disclosure] to [FD] or 3. Do nothing 1. The first choice is preferable for me and, I would hope, for most folks. Len says he didn't really want it when he started the list anyways. So we are actually going to change it now. 2. Choice two may be preferable for people who can only filter their incoming messages based on the subject prefix. So, if you WANT there to continue to be a subject prefix, SPEAK UP!!! 3. Choice three sucks and if anyone wants this SPEAK UP so we know just how many people want this. This is the least preferrable as it clutters the Subject header and makes the list harder to read through for those of us using a text based e-mail client.
For what it's worth, I vote for #3. I don't really pay that close attention to sender address, and having the prefix in the subject makes it really easy to identify list mail for direct correspondence. I suppose I could live with #2 if I had to. --Arthur Corliss Bolverk's Lair -- http://arthur.corlissfamily.org/ Digital Mages -- http://www.digitalmages.com/ "Live Free or Die, the Only Way to Live" -- NH State Motto _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- [Full-Disclosure] Re: Full-disclosure digest, Vol 1 #1052 - 29 msgs Arthur Corliss (Aug 21)
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Full-disclosure digest, Vol 1 #1052 - 29 msgs Jack Whitsitt (jofny) (Aug 21)
- Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: Full-disclosure digest, Vol 1 #1052 - 29 msgs Joel R. Helgeson (Aug 21)