Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re[2]: pissed off
From: "badpack3t" <badpack3t () security-protocols com>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 11:55:51 -0400 (EDT)
Tamer, You really are an idiot aren't you.
To stress, the vulnerability that Badpack3t has found out is a different vulnerability.
and then you say:
Currently the situation is that; Badpack3t has figured out that he published an advisory on the vulnerability that does not belong to him and I explained the truth.
I think you need to put that hooka down, and read a little closer. You dont own any rights to any vulnerabilities. Is this some new law that you just created or am I mistaken? The vendor fixed the bug you found back in 2002. You need to read the advisory a little closer before you start sending our your little bullshit emails about copyright laws and whatnot. I think you would be better off just dropping this because your making yourself look like a real ass. -badpack3t www.security-protocols.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I could not understand why this argument keept on this much. I am so busy now a days. I could not find any time to write a response to the maillish back after i recieved the mail from Badpack3t. To stress, the vulnerability that Badpack3t has found out is a different vulnerability. However, the one that Secunia has found out, of which all rights belong to me, is not a acceptable case. Currently the situation is that; Badpack3t has figured out that he published an advisory on the vulnerability that does not belong to him and I explained the truth. he vulnerability the Badpack3t has found out is different one, however, the reaction that he act against secunia is wrong. I wanted to express this. Cheers, Tamer Sahin http://www.securityoffice.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (MingW32) iD8DBQE+qow8gfeC/CdyvS8RAnwxAJ9XHjhI9Bia+IhWEvf5opzPTuWTVACffD4c m3WSr4PwEgpym5+t9blO8qc= =8T7K -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Xeneo Webserver Vulnerability, (continued)
- Re: Xeneo Webserver Vulnerability Jakob Balle (Apr 23)
- Re: Xeneo Webserver Vulnerability badpack3t (Apr 23)
- Re: Xeneo Webserver Vulnerability badpack3t (Apr 23)
- pissed off cyn0n (Apr 24)
- Re: pissed off Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 25)
- Re: pissed off Melvyn Sopacua (Apr 26)
- Re[2]: pissed off Tamer Sahin (Apr 26)
- Re: Re[2]: pissed off Knud Erik Højgaard (Apr 26)
- Re: Re[2]: pissed off Cedric Blancher (Apr 26)
- Re: Re[2]: pissed off Halil Demirezen (Apr 27)
- Re: Re[2]: pissed off badpack3t (Apr 26)
- Re: Re[2]: pissed off Halil Demirezen (Apr 27)
- Re: Re[2]: pissed off Steve (Apr 28)
- Re: Re[2]: pissed off madsaxon (Apr 28)
- pissed off cyn0n (Apr 24)
- Re: Xeneo Webserver Vulnerability Jakob Balle (Apr 23)