Full Disclosure mailing list archives
openssl exploit code
From: hellnbak () nmrc org (hellNbak)
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 21:00:36 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 16 Sep 2002, Charles Stevenson wrote:
That's interesting as a bugtraq moderator approved a post of an exploit of mine without asking for consent. Namely RaQFuCK.sh. What's worse? I attempted to reply to the person who posted my exploit and discuss that I had only sent the exploit to full-disclosure but this little piece of information was conveniently withheld from bugtraq subscribers. Comments?
Well, consistancy would be a nice thing thats for sure. I can't speak for Dave or for Bugtraq I can only speak for myself and to a lesser extend VulnWatch. If the code is obviously copyrighted to someone else common sense tell me that one should check before releasing it. Of course there will always be ones that slip through but and effort should be made. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- "I don't intend to offend, I offend with my intent" hellNbak () nmrc org http://www.nmrc.org/~hellnbak -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Current thread:
- openssl exploit code, (continued)
- openssl exploit code Florian Weimer (Sep 17)
- openssl exploit code hellNbak (Sep 17)
- openssl exploit code Florian Weimer (Sep 17)
- openssl exploit code Isaak Bloodlore (Sep 17)
- openssl exploit code Ken Pfeil (Sep 17)
- openssl exploit code Jonathan Rickman (Sep 17)
- openssl exploit code hellNbak (Sep 17)
- openssl exploit code Georgi Guninski (Sep 17)
- openssl exploit code Isaak Bloodlore (Sep 17)
- openssl exploit code hellNbak (Sep 16)