Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: more segfaults on Redhat 6.x when passing "/proc/misc" as a parameter
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas () netcore fi>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:51:33 +0200 (EET)
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Dr. Peter Bieringer wrote:
--On Dienstag, 29. Oktober 2002 08:26 +0200 Pekka Savola <pekkas () netcore fi> wrote:On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Day Jay wrote:Hi, "more" segfaults when you pass "/proc/misc" to it as a parameter. This happens on my Redhat 6.0 and my Redhat 6.2 box. More is setuid root. See below:[...] This appears to be very bogus. 'more' is never setuid unless you made it so... I didn't manage to segfaul 'more' on RHL62 box either..But me here as "root" and as a normal user. Using kernel-2.2.22-6.2.2 with openwall patch and libsafe-1.3 Tested on 2 systems. BTW: cat and less are ok.
Oh, that's something caused by the kernel upgrade. -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted, Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall" Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- more segfaults on Redhat 6.x when passing "/proc/misc" as a parameter Day Jay (Oct 28)
- Re: more segfaults on Redhat 6.x when passing "/proc/misc" as a parameter Pekka Savola (Oct 28)
- Re: more segfaults on Redhat 6.x when passing "/proc/misc" as a parameter Dr. Peter Bieringer (Oct 29)
- Re: more segfaults on Redhat 6.x when passing "/proc/misc" as a parameter Pekka Savola (Oct 29)
- Re: more segfaults on Redhat 6.x when passing "/proc/misc" as a parameter Dr. Peter Bieringer (Oct 29)
- Re: more segfaults on Redhat 6.x when passing "/proc/misc" as a parameter Pekka Savola (Oct 28)