Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: RE: 7350reass (who's responsible)
From: skyper <skyper () segfault net>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 06:58:20 +0000
fake. made me laught for 10 seconds. skyper On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 06:16:16AM -0000, dev-null () no-id com wrote:
<funkysh> k <skyper> wasnt meant to go outside darknet ;) <ler> heheh maybe we should let everyone run it <skyper> no.. it will come back to us <funkysh> i could post a half-assed analysis with warning <skyper> yes <skyper> that would be nice <funkysh> btw, is there a genuine bug like that? :) <ler> yes <skyper> im afraid so ;) <skyper> it isnt as easy to exploit as that trojan appeared <skyper> a lot more work is involved <skyper> and its still being perfected ;) <funkysh> hm <funkysh> all BSD? <skyper> yes but only openbsd has been worked on now <skyper> openbsd also has a pf bug <funkysh> of? <funkysh> pf* <skyper> yes -- This message has been sent via an anonymous mail relay at www.no-id.com. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
-- PGP: dig @segfault.net skyper axfr|grep TX|cut -f2 -d\"|sort|cut -f2 -d\; _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: 7350reass (who's responsible) dev-null (Oct 22)
- Re: RE: 7350reass (who's responsible) skyper (Oct 23)