Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: <Format-Fix> Re: Beyond black, white, and grey: the Yellow Hat


From: "democow the happy cow" <democowx86 () hotmail com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 19:09:58 +0000





From the desk of democow….

/*unfortunately for most of us we depend on someone else at some point to be as security minded on their systems as we are on our own, life doesn't always work out the way we would like. What is distressing though is seeing someone, specifically "hellnbak" who has! recently owned up to being one of the learned through using security lists, now groveling at the "phrick" feet */

now in a little defense of hellnbak he did not show any support of #phrack he was on the other hand making comments on how the current manifestation of the infosec industry uses deceptive and one time flat out unethical sales practices

although I do welcome his opinions

/*
awww shucks trying to cover your own "sell out behind". Posting what seemed to be a private email just to make yourself look sincere is beyond sad. Might know more than you care to admit about that back stabbing comment you made on a personal level eh? I have yet to see a contribution to this list from Steve aka hellnbak other than a lot of comments, and his often offered $0.2. How many times have you posted a fix for anything? */

and I hope he dosen’t…

/* Isn't that the argument of all security consultants? But back to my point, the above is quite a change from how "hellnbak" felt back in August: <snip>"Tell me, based on the PHC definition of a hacker -- one who breaks into boxes, are you a hacker? If so, then I have to thank you for the long term employment you have given me. You guys are not the solution, you are part of the problem. Maybe even the root cause.</snip> */

people tend to change their mind when they give a subject a second look, this may be true in the case of hellnbak.

We are using this list to convey our message, in our opinion that is the only good reason for this lists existence

/* "Several recent studi! es have shown that one in every 4 Americans suffers from some form of mental disorder. Think about that, if 3 of your friends seem normal, then you must be the one." */

i think that only applies to you mate

-

I would also like to add something new to this “debate” do any of you whitehats out there even consider what jackasses you are? When you discover a new class of vulnerability in software applications you post a information about it( buffer restriction problems..etc) that I don’t have a huge problem because it allows programmers to become more aware of problems they should try to avoid in their code.. but then you take software that people have worked very long and hard on and try to find miniscule problems within it then after you do that what do you do?

You post the problem on a mailing list or try to contact the people who made it, but if they don’t respond to you in the way YOU want them to, you slander them for it on mailing lists… one of the more recent examples that comes to mind is the IE ssl certificate authority issue that ms was not even contacted about

Now I know a some whitehats do contact the vendors in a more respectable manner now-a-days but as soon as the vendor sends out a patch they just choose to give out almost every little detail on how to exploit the problem to public lists.. sometimes even PoC code that is just an exploit that crashes the program in question, or runs some sort of dumbed down shellcode is given out to the public.

Considering that there is almost no chance that every user of the vulnerable product had almost no time to patch the problem or be alerted of it… why do whitehats feel the need to let the public know how to take advantage of something like that? How is that improving security?

-democow
“a cow for every generation”






_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: