Full Disclosure mailing list archives

OT: Snosoft vs HP

From: full-disclosure () lists netsys com (Tom Perrine)
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 11:47:06 -0700

The topic of HP's legal action will be discussed in the vendor
selection meeting for our next bazillion-$ supercomputer (Linux
cluster) purchase.

HP/Compaq is currently rated Not Acceptable.  We can't afford the
liability exposure of dealing with a company that acts in this
manner.  What if one of our students or users does something that
causes HP to sue the University?

The UC lawyers are gonna hurl when they see the ramifications of this
one.

--tep

-- 
Tom E. Perrine <tep () SDSC EDU> | San Diego Supercomputer Center 
http://www.sdsc.edu/~tep/     |

Current thread:

OT: Snosoft vs HP Len Rose (Jul 31)
- OT: Snosoft vs HP ATD (Jul 31)
  - OT: Snosoft vs HP John Scimone (Jul 31)
    - OT: Snosoft vs HP Len Rose (Jul 31)
- OT: Snosoft vs HP Blue Boar (Jul 31)
  - OT: Snosoft vs HP John Scimone (Jul 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- OT: Snosoft vs HP Moyer, Shawn (Jul 31)
  - OT: Snosoft vs HP Andrew Pinski (Jul 31)
  - OT: Snosoft vs HP Tom Perrine (Jul 31)
- OT: Snosoft vs HP Cushing, David (Jul 31)
- OT: Snosoft vs HP Dehner, Benjamin T. (Jul 31)
- OT: Snosoft vs HP Dave Killion (Jul 31)
- OT: Snosoft vs HP Moyer, Shawn (Jul 31)