default list reply-to: address

[full-disclosure () lists netsys com (martin f krafft)]

--7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

also sprach Roland Postle <mail () blazde co uk> [2002.07.17.0344 +0200]:
> For what it's worth, I prefer it that way. With the exception of
> securityfocus' lists, all the mailing lists I'm on do it that way. It's w=
hat
> I'm used to, and, since the majority of replies go to the list not the
> individual who wrote the original post, it makes sense.

Which is why proper mail clients handle this appropriately. In Mutt,
I press 'r' to reply to the author, 'l' to reply to the list, and 'g'
to reply to both. Obviously this breaks when Reply-To is set...

Anyway, I give you this to read:
  http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

> The [Full-Disclosure] in the subject (that someone else objected to) I li=
ke
> as well, but I don't have such good reasons. I just like it.

It wastes bandwidth and doesn't add information that you couldn't add
on the client-side. I am opposed.

--=20
martin;              (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
  \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck
=20
quantum mechanics: the dreams stuff is made of.

--7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAj01MUkACgkQIgvIgzMMSnVi5wCeMtH9ovZ4+S8dpLV5OGanS4A8
D64AoIBj9o9s1h/lqsCjq0oHXLiJtU6K
=7Z70
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z--