Re: Clarification on Xitami DoS

[full-disclosure () lists netsys com (Steven M. Christey)]

I said:

> This thread is a good demonstration for why vendors need to be
> responsive to incoming vulnerability reports... Greater overall
> responsiveness by vendors is covered heavily by section 3 of the
> Responsible Vulnerability Disclosure Process draft

Georgi Guninski said:

> In my opinion bundling bad stuff and good stuff in one document does
> not make the whole document good.

I hope that we can restructure the next version of the document so
that recommendations for vendor responsiveness are somewhat separate
from the proposed disclosure process.  That way, vulnerability
researchers/notifiers could point to particular parts of the
disclosure document to give them some "backup," even if they do not
agree with other parts of the document.

- Steve