IDS mailing list archives

Re: Snort inline and iptables


From: "Ratnakumar C H" <ratnakumarch () visualsoft-tech com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:43:01 +0530

Hi all,

1- can i use snort inline+iptables in router (no bridge) mode under linux?
--yes ,we can do soo.

more help on setup:    http://linuxgazette.net/117/savage.html
2- what's the performance issuses when using snort inline + flexresponse mode?

--i my view performance issues are more.although if you have a good processer and good configuration still it depends on the traffic.

Regards,
Ratna Kumar
Visual Soft Technologies Ltd

----- Original Message ----- From: "Soi, Dhruv" <dsoi () ipolicynetworks com>
To: <afshinlamei () gmail com>; <focus-ids () securityfocus com>
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 4:04 PM
Subject: RE: Snort inline and iptables



Dear all,

1- can i use snort inline+iptables in router (no bridge) mode under linux?
Snippet copied from one of the mail that I received from mailing list.
-------------------------------------------------------
There are active-response modules for Snort available.

Snort can do content-detection; with active response, the packets could
be dropped / filtered / redirected.

Michael T. Babcock
Triple PC Ltd.
-------------------------------------------------------


To use it with IPTABLES you need to patch the kernel and netfilter to support Hex search.

Thanks
Dhruv

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS

Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it
with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT.
Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708
to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------





------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test Your IDS

Is your IDS deployed correctly?
Find out quickly and easily by testing it with real-world attacks from CORE IMPACT. Go to http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/CoreSecurity_focus-ids_040708 to learn more.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: