IDS mailing list archives
Re: ASIC-based vs. Software-based Security Platform
From: Ron Gula <rgula () tenablesecurity com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 08:33:24 -0400
Of course, Look at companies like IPolicy. They make extensive use of ASICs and FPGAs, but have a completely flexible underlying architecture for updating how they do network flow reconstruction, IDS, firewall, etc. Ron Gula At 01:49 AM 8/27/2003 -0700, Shaiful wrote:
Hi guys, Can we have the best of both worlds? With the emergence of network processors and the FPGA like devices that you can buy off-the-shelf, I think it is a very promising direction. Pls refer to the following links: Intel's Network Processor IXP family: http://www.intel.com/design/network/products/npfamily/ Altera's Nios development kit http://www.altera.com/products/devkits/altera/kit-nios.html Tarari's content inspections processor http://www.tarari.com/index2.html Regards, Shaiful
---------------------------------------------------------------------------Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training Federal, September 29-30 (Training), October 1-2 (Briefings) in Tysons Corner, VA; the worldÂs premier technical IT security event. Modeled after the famous Black Hat event in Las Vegas! 6 tracks, 12 training sessions, top speakers and sponsors. Symanetc is the Diamond sponsor. Early-bird registration ends September 6 Visit: www.blackhat.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- ASIC-based vs. Software-based Security Platform Klaus, Chris (ISSAtlanta) (Aug 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: ASIC-based vs. Software-based Security Platform Ron Gula (Aug 26)
- Re: ASIC-based vs. Software-based Security Platform Shaiful (Aug 27)
- Re: ASIC-based vs. Software-based Security Platform Ron Gula (Aug 27)
- Re: ASIC-based vs. Software-based Security Platform Shaiful (Aug 27)
- Re: ASIC-based vs. Software-based Security Platform Mark Teicher (Aug 27)