Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: obscure email address formats
From: Kurt Buff <kurt.buff () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 15:23:55 -0700
I know that '+' addressing is commonly used. Don't know about others, such as '!' routing, etc. On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 13:30, ArkanoiD <ark () eltex net> wrote:
Is there any good reason to allow email addresses (in smtp, imap and alikes) in any format different from mailbox@fqdn ? There is plenty of other stuff defined in RFCs and I wonder if anyone really uses it so I should *not* just filter it out. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- obscure email address formats ArkanoiD (May 23)
- Re: obscure email address formats Carson Gaspar (May 23)
- Re: obscure email address formats Chuck Swiger (May 23)
- Re: obscure email address formats david (May 23)
- Re: obscure email address formats Carl Friedberg (May 23)
- Re: obscure email address formats Kurt Buff (May 23)
- Re: obscure email address formats Marcus J. Ranum (May 23)