Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Dark Reading: Firewalls Ready for Evolutionary Shift
From: ArkanoiD <ark () eltex net>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 15:59:24 +0300
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 12:37:25PM -0500, Dave Piscitello wrote:
what you need to be able to do is to enforce valid HTTP,This would indeed be a positive step but: What is "valid HTTP"? Who defines it (not being naive here but it does not seem that W3C is the answer when tens of millions of browsers will do HTTP according to what the vendor releases, which becomes de facto "valid").
Yes, it is mostly w3c, i'd even say some "safe subset" of what w3c permits us to do. Though we need a lot of heurisitcs to figure out how to fix broken implementations in transit. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: Dark Reading: Firewalls Ready for Evolutionary Shift ArkanoiD (Dec 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Dark Reading: Firewalls Ready for Evolutionary Shift Jim Seymour (Dec 01)
- Re: Dark Reading: Firewalls Ready for Evolutionary Shift Thomas Ptacek (Dec 05)
- Message not available
- Re: Dark Reading: Firewalls Ready for Evolutionary Shift Marcus J. Ranum (Dec 05)
- Message not available
- Re: Dark Reading: Firewalls Ready for Evolutionary Shift Frank Knobbe (Dec 06)
- Re: Dark Reading: Firewalls Ready for Evolutionary Shift david (Dec 06)
- Re: Dark Reading: Firewalls Ready for Evolutionary Shift Dave Piscitello (Dec 10)
- Re: Dark Reading: Firewalls Ready for Evolutionary Shift ArkanoiD (Dec 11)
- Re: Dark Reading: Firewalls Ready for Evolutionary Shift Darren Reed (Dec 10)