Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Query: Why bother with an application proxy over stateful packet filtering?
From: "Patrick M. Hausen" <hausen () punkt de>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 16:58:18 +0200
Hi, Will,
I am wondering why would the be a need to web up a proxy such as a web proxy (Squid) instead of just using a stateful packet filtering firewall (iptables) only in a network?
I suggest you start by reading these two papers for an answer: http://www.avolio.com/papers/apgw+spf.html http://www.securecomputing.com/webform.cfm?id=123 The latter requires one-time registration to download, so Secure Computing can send you sp^H^Himportant security related information. Kind regards, Patrick M. Hausen Leiter Netzwerke und Sicherheit -- punkt.de GmbH * Vorholzstr. 25 * 76137 Karlsruhe Tel. 0721 9109 0 * Fax 0721 9109 100 info () punkt de http://www.punkt.de Gf: Jürgen Egeling AG Mannheim 108285 _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Query: Why bother with an application proxy over stateful packet filtering? william fitzgerald (Aug 27)
- Re: Query: Why bother with an application proxy over stateful packet filtering? Patrick M. Hausen (Aug 27)
- Message not available
- Re: Query: Why bother with an application proxy over stateful packet filtering? william fitzgerald (Aug 27)
- Re: Query: Why bother with an application proxy over stateful packet filtering? Marcin Antkiewicz (Aug 27)