Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum
From: "R. DuFresne" <dufresne () sysinfo com>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:34:50 -0500 (EST)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Dave Piscitello wrote:
Paul Melson wrote:-----Original Message-----Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forumnon-representative (i think if one tried that with, say, Cyberguard,Though i think people who buy Checkpoint stuff are somehowscary. That means 80% firewalls could be thrown off withwe'd see completely different picture) the results are still scary. Damnno further harm to security.I'd agree that choosing a different product customer set would probably yield different results, but I'm not sure that Check Point is going to be worse than others. In fact, experience tells me that the small/medium ITshops out there that still have their NetScreen-10 or their PIX 510 with thesame rule set and software on it for 3+ years are even more likely to have flawed configs.Many SMBs have barebones policies. What I commonly see: - default ANY outbound - inbound http to a Port address translated web server - inbound telnet/ssh to some 3rd party application server (e.g., vacation rental software on SCO boxes with credit card DBs ;-( - logging to the localhost (appliance) which rolls the logs (no long term store) - default admin account, same password today as configured day 1 - IPsec using IKE AG mode with PSK
All those nasty windows ports and protocols 138-139, 445, 5000, etc passing in both directions, etc...
Thanks, Ron DuFresne - -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ admin & senior security consultant: sysinfo.com http://sysinfo.com Key fingerprint = 9401 4B13 B918 164C 647A E838 B2DF AFCC 94B0 6629 ...We waste time looking for the perfect lover instead of creating the perfect love. -Tom Robbins <Still Life With Woodpecker> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD4okOst+vzJSwZikRAqkFAJ9Kis49cKRsmnUKvXpA1KF4RfwXNgCgpiXJ XF7E7QWzXeeqZWPRRCJrPx0= =jiVk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- RE: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Paul Melson (Feb 01)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum nick leachman (Feb 02)
- RE: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Paul Melson (Feb 02)
- RE: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Paul Robertson (Feb 02)
- RE: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum R. DuFresne (Feb 02)
- RE: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Paul Melson (Feb 02)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Dave Piscitello (Feb 02)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum R. DuFresne (Feb 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum R. DuFresne (Feb 01)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum Devdas Bhagat (Feb 07)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum ArkanoiD (Feb 02)
- Re: FW appliance comparison - Seeking input for the forum nick leachman (Feb 02)