Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: How does your firewall handle DNS messages > 512 octets?
From: Aaron Smith <smitha () byui edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 10:47:22 -0600
We use a PIX, but rather than change its config we chose this: C:\dnscmd DNSSERVER/Config /EnableEDnsProbes 0 Much easier and DNS still "just works." @@ron Smith On Tue, 2006-08-29 at 15:13 -0400, Dave Piscitello wrote:
Hi all, I am trying to understand how different firewalls behave when they receive a UDP datagram containing a DNS message that uses EDNS0 (RFC 2671) to support message sizes greater than the 512 maximum specified in RFC 1035 (original DNS). Specifically, - does your firewall block/silently discard such messages by default? - do you know the command to allow the message if blocked by default? I've found dozens of claims that firewalls don't handle EDNS0 correctly, but after a long search, I've only found URLs indicating that Firewall-1 and Pix block by default and have workarounds. I'm curious whether SonicWall, Netscreen, Symantec, etc. behave similarly. I'd also be curious to learn the behavior of IPS devices and DNS proxies (Watchguard, WinProxy, etc). You can send replies directly to me and I'll compile responses and post to the list to save electrons. Thanks in advance, Dave _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- How does your firewall handle DNS messages > 512 octets? Dave Piscitello (Aug 30)
- Re: How does your firewall handle DNS messages > 512 octets? Aaron Smith (Aug 31)
- Re: How does your firewall handle DNS messages > 512 octets? ArkanoiD (Aug 31)
- Re: How does your firewall handle DNS messages > 512 octets? Dave Piscitello (Aug 31)