Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers
From: David Lang <david.lang () digitalinsight com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:23:45 -0700 (PDT)
as others have said, find out what your real performance requirements are, and keep the future in mind.
check the cost of upgrading the 'optiomized' hardware, you may be amazed at the costs ($1k for 512M of ram for example)
generix x86 hardware is so fast nowdays that I really doubt that you need the added performance from an 'optimized' version.
there are valid arguments (on both sides) about managing the OS yourself vs trusting the vendor to do all the OS changes (the appliance approach)
personally I would buy my own hardware and run it myself, there are just too many times when I want to do just a little something extra on the firewall that would be trivial to script, but isn't allowed on an appliance.
David Lang On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Emily Conrad wrote:
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 20:17:59 +0000 From: Emily Conrad <emilydconrad () hotmail com> To: firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com Subject: [fw-wiz] Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers Hello, We are working on a project to upgrade our firewall infrastructure.One of the questions is whether to use FW-1 on a standard Intel server or to use a special-purpose optimized version of FW-1 on a dedicated hardware platform such as Nokia firewall appliance or Crossbeam systems C30/X40.Does anyone have any advice on what factors are important when making such a decision?Thanks, Emily _________________________________________________________________FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
-- There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. -- C.A.R. Hoare _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers Emily Conrad (Jul 21)
- Re: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers Marcus J. Ranum (Jul 21)
- Re: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers Carson Gaspar (Jul 21)
- RE: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers Paul Melson (Jul 21)
- Re: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers David Lang (Jul 21)
- RE: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers Keith A. Glass (Jul 22)
- Re: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers Marcus J. Ranum (Jul 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers Keith A. Glass (Jul 21)
- RE: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers Paul Melson (Jul 21)
- RE: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers Sawyer, Christopher (Jul 21)
- RE: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers Paul Melson (Jul 21)
- RE: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers Ionut Boldizsar (Jul 25)
- Message not available
- RE: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers Marcus J. Ranum (Jul 25)
- Message not available
- Re: Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers Marcus J. Ranum (Jul 21)