Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: VM system for firewall use
From: "Paul D. Robertson" <paul () compuwar net>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 11:17:40 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Christopher Hicks wrote:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Paul D. Robertson wrote:I'm really unsure as to why a jail isn't enough though--I was thinking about this and I'm thinking JAILs plus MAC would provide a more winning solution than seperating things by using VMs.
I'm leaning that way as well, though it seems non-intuitive on the surface.
Scenario: a compartment gets compromised. If that compartment is in a JAIL/MAC environment then what that compromise can accomplish is effectively minimized. In the VM environment the compromise would compromise that entire VM and that VM could communicate with any other VM in any way it pleased.
More importantly (I think) the data objects in a MAC environment never lose their label, and therefore enforcement is the same over all things that would be VMs- if that includes things like executability, or if it includes compartments for devices, the boundaries are held no matter what happens, so there's less chance for malice (depending on policy and design) than with some sort of one-off inter-VM communication system.
The JAIL/MAC version seems a lot less scary and catastrophic to me. Am I missing something here?
I'm not sure jail is even necessary with the right MAC modules and capability stuff turned on. If you have the partition module and the seeotheruids module loaded, I'm not sure that jail gives you much. More importantly, VMs don't scale well if you have lots of processes to protect from one another, MAC seems to. Paul ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions paul () compuwar net which may have no basis whatsoever in fact." probertson () trusecure com Director of Risk Assessment TruSecure Corporation _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: VM system for firewall use, (continued)
- Re: VM system for firewall use John Babwell (Oct 11)
- Re: VM system for firewall use Paul D. Robertson (Oct 11)
- Re: VM system for firewall use ArkanoiD (Oct 12)
- Re: VM system for firewall use Paul D. Robertson (Oct 12)
- Re: VM system for firewall use ArkanoiD (Oct 12)
- Re: VM system for firewall use Paul D. Robertson (Oct 12)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: VM system for firewall use ArkanoiD (Oct 12)
- Re: VM system for firewall use Paul D. Robertson (Oct 12)
- Re: VM system for firewall use ArkanoiD (Oct 12)
- Re: VM system for firewall use Christopher Hicks (Oct 12)
- Re: VM system for firewall use Christopher Hicks (Oct 12)
- Re: VM system for firewall use Paul D. Robertson (Oct 12)
- Re: VM system for firewall use Marcus J. Ranum (Oct 12)
- Re: VM system for firewall use Bennett Todd (Oct 12)
- Re: VM system for firewall use Ng Pheng Siong (Oct 14)
- Re: VM system for firewall use Crispin Cowan (Oct 17)
- Re: VM system for firewall use Christian Kreibich (Oct 12)
- Re: VM system for firewall use Paul D. Robertson (Oct 12)
- Re: VM system for firewall use Paul D. Robertson (Oct 12)