Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: Pix 501 configuration question
From: "Josh Welch" <jwelch () buffalowildwings com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 11:00:31 -0600
Adam Lang said:
This is probably an extremely basic question for this forum, but in an hour of looking I haven't found a better forum to ask in, except paying multiple hundreds of dollars to call up Cisco and ask them. I'm a total firewall newbie, and have just set up my first one for my company, a Pix 501. I think I did a fairly good job of it, all things considered, but there's one thing that I just can't figure out. A secondary company web server is behind the firewall, as are our secondary DNS and two publicly available WebDAV servers. These machines have been given one-to-one NAT... 123.456.789.195 maps to 192.168.1.195, for example, for the web server. This works fine from the outside... anyone can connect to 123.456.789.195 on the web port (and can't connect on any other port). And from the inside, of course, anyone can connect to 192.168.1.195 on any port. However, I want my fellow employees to be able to connect to 123.456.789.195 from INSIDE the firewall. Hacks like the name-server-substitution stuff (where the Pix substitutes 192.168.1.195 for the 'real' address when the lookup passes through the firewall) are just not going to cut it. Is this possible? Why doesn't it work in the first place... is there something inherently insecure about allowing people from inside to connect to an inside machine's external ip? The pix is 123.456.789.195, and I can't imagine why it can't talk to itself. Do I need to set up some sort of default routing? Do I need to somehow make a rule translating 123.456.789.195 to 192.168.1.195 on the inside, even though the setup tool doesn't appear to allow you to do that? (Maybe I need to do it from the command line?) Do I need to ditch the Pix because it just can't do this? (Please say no.) Thanks in advance for your help. --Adam Lang
I think that this is a matter of the Pix not being willing or able to route traffic back to itself. You might be able to make another firewall do it, but its hard to say. We run iptables, and when we had a similar setting to yours, we had an internal DNS server so that the box was referenced by its private IP internally and its public IP externally. I don't remember if we did that because it wouldn't work, or because it was less complicated, but I think you're going to have to do it this way. Josh _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Pix 501 configuration question Adam Lang (Nov 07)
- Re: Pix 501 configuration question Victor B. Williams (Nov 09)
- Re: Pix 501 configuration question Mikael Olsson (Nov 09)
- RE: Pix 501 configuration question Josh Welch (Nov 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Pix 501 configuration question Steven A. Fletcher (Nov 10)
- RE: Pix 501 configuration question Melson, Paul (Nov 10)
- Re: Pix 501 configuration question David West (Nov 11)