Firewall Wizards mailing list archives

Re: Benefit of firewall over NAT-only 'protected' network


From: Paul Robertson <proberts () patriot net>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 09:23:02 -0400 (EDT)

On Wed, 28 May 2003 ark () eltex net wrote:

If they really do not use it, you are completely right, any unused
port should be blocked (if we use packet filtering firewalls. i run
irc from the office but i use proxy ;-)

Outbound, it's difficult to block arbitrary ports, however- 6667 is one of 
the ones that I'd insist on blocking/logging because 99% of the time in a 
business environment, the client trying to get out is going to be mirc.dll 
embedded in a trojan (the current vogue is to use SMB share password 
guessing and IIS worms to compromise more internal clients, then 6667/tcp 
out to an IRC network for control.)

Anytime we get more trojaned machines than legitimate machines using a 
service, we need to examine the service closely.  I've encountered more 
and more trojaned machines lately in my investigation of incidents.  This 
is not a good trend, and especially with worms, it's controlable by 
denying IRC outbound by default, and handling exceptions on a case-by-case 
basis (or making them SSH out to a shell server and use a command-line 
client.)

I'd challenge the folks on this list to _at_least_log_ outbound port 6667 
activity in their companies for a week, and then see who's really using 
IRC, and who's got trojaned desktops.  If more than 2% of the clients are 
going out, it's likely you're botnetted.

Waiting until someone calls to tell you that your network is participating 
in a DDoS is too late.

In an ideal world, everyone would practice default deny both in and 
outbound- but I don't see that happening anytime soon, so at least let's 
address the risks of the day by default, and move on from there.

Regards,

Paul
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Robertson      "My statements in this message are personal opinions
proberts () patriot net      which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
probertson () trusecure com Director of Risk Assessment TruSecure Corporation

_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards


Current thread: