Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: FirePass questions
From: "Joseph Steinberg" <joseph () whale-com com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 14:05:32 -0500
So called "SSL VPN"s (such as the product that you mention) can be deployed securely -- but doing so requires addressing many concerns, not only related to the issue to which you refer of "punching a hole through your firewall" (which is obviously a serious problem), but also to the problem of people accessing from insecure locations such as Internet kiosks and leaving the browser cache, temporary files, and other data on machines that subsequent users can access. Whale has been in the business of offering secure SSL VPNs for almost two years, and whether you want to use our product or someone else's, you probably want to read the white paper available on our web site (http://www.whalecommunications.com/whitepapers) that discusses the security issues surrounding deploying SSL VPNs. Joseph Steinberg Director of Technical Services Whale Communications In response to: Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 10:37:46 -0600 To: firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com From: john.smith () minolta-qms com Subject: [fw-wiz] FirePass questions Greetings Everyone, I've searched through the 2002 and 2003 Bugtraq, Firewall Wizards and VPN lists and not come up with anything. A group within our company is looking at the FirePass appliance (www.uroam.com). The appliance appears to work by punching a hole through your firewall and offers a whole range of services. My opinion is that this is a *very* bad thing: a) The group wants connectivity from a large enough number of locations that filtering would be next to impossible, if not impossible, therefore we would have to allow access to it from the whole world. b) We would eliminate the firewall from the security equation. c) We would be depending on the security of the appliance to protect the corporation, and it is designed to *grant* access, not prevent or deny it. My questions: 1) Does anyone have any experience with the FirePass? 2) Is there a way to securely offer access to this box? 3) Am I totally off base in my above assumptions and my analysis of the appliance? Chances are I will be required to install this box. In this case the middle ground I am shooting for is only granting access to the box via VPN (even though they are eliminating 'traditional' VPN from the picture according to their literature). We already use VPN, so to me only allowing external access through the VPN is a trade-off - our security stance is no worse than it was before. Thanks for all your help. js _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- FirePass questions john . smith (Feb 14)
- Re: FirePass questions yossarian (Feb 14)
- Re: FirePass questions Ben Nagy (Feb 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: FirePass questions Joseph Steinberg (Feb 18)