Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: Anti-Warchalking attack?
From: "Behm, Jeffrey L." <BehmJL () bvsg com>
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 08:04:02 -0500
From: Paul D. Robertson [mailto:proberts () patriot net] If there are more "invalid" chalks than good, then chalking ceases to be anything useful.
Tell that to the friggin' spammers...They don't buy into that sort of logic... ;-) _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Anti-Warchalking attack? Paul Robertson (Sep 03)
- PIX VPN Question Richard Worwood (Sep 03)
- Re: Anti-Warchalking attack? Marcus J. Ranum (Sep 03)
- Re: Anti-Warchalking attack? Darren Reed (Sep 03)
- Re: Anti-Warchalking attack? H. Morrow Long (Sep 03)
- Re: Anti-Warchalking attack? Paul D. Robertson (Sep 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Anti-Warchalking attack? Behm, Jeffrey L. (Sep 04)
- RE: Anti-Warchalking attack? Scott, Richard (Sep 04)
- RE: Anti-Warchalking attack? Paul D. Robertson (Sep 04)
- Re: Anti-Warchalking attack? John McDermott (Sep 04)
- RE: Anti-Warchalking attack? Paul D. Robertson (Sep 04)